If they didn’t offer 100 side projects I think the PT crowd would realise how much -better- Cubase is as a product… and I think that would’ve encourage SB to do even better with it, instead of going off on all these goofy other deals.It is recommended that all recording be done on the performing side of the Sessionwire call - meaning one side needs to have a DAW open to record in, while the other simply monitors the performance through Sessionwire.Įach user may be using a different DAW or may/may not be using an audio interface - therefore, each user will need to reference the correct signal flow diagram for their particular DAW and setup.īelow are common setups when using Sessionwire alongside Cubase/Nuendo. Because the thing is: the stuff they are good at, is MUCH better than the competition. Too many products with too many dead ends, instead of continuing to strengthen the 2-3 things they just -rule- at.

A little more pressure (just a little) might not get us all the things we want, but it might keep SB a bit more focused-and if there’s one thing SB has lacked over the years, it’s FOCUS. I wish just a taste of the righteous indignation over there was still present here. The only real schadenfreude I feel? It’s kinda pleasant to know the Nuendo crowd can get just as annoyed as me… and I saved $2,000. Now, we have the worst of both worlds: SB devs are now 100% hidden and there is almost no tolerance for constructive grousing. And even more important? There were a certain # of forum participants and grousers who pushed SB and I believe that made a positive difference. And customers -expect- to be able to grouse.īack in the day (the Sparky forum), it was UGLY, but it was also a time when SB actually -interacted- with customers and that created the appearance of care. There, SB at least puts on a show of interest. My point is that the Nuendo forum is like the Merc dealership. (Well they used to before every Tom, Dick n Harry started leasing 'em.) But when ya go to the dealer? They treat ya like yer SPECIAL.

Most of the features in the Merc? Never use 'em. Truth be told? No practical reason to own a Mercedes in the US v. People grouse about features now rather than showstopper bugs. C5.0 was relatively clean and so was C6.0… compared with SX and VST. It seems like, at some point around C4, SB really buckled down on the QC. I think Nuendo and Cubase are both now mature products.

It seems like this is a real part of what you get for your money with Nuendo. This may sound like schadenfreude but I’m actually kinda jealous of the Nuendo community for one reason: They get to bitch. So why pay for a few high-end features I would rarely use (D/R excepted) when everything I’d use 9x% of the time is already there? It seems like SB ‘tests’ new features out on Cubase before foisting on the ‘pro’ Nuendo base. In fact, I stick with Cubase because it is traditionally -ahead- of Nuendo in terms of MIDI and various new features. And it’s probably easier to manage a HUGE audio interface-like 128 inputs… which is about 104 more than I’ll ever have.īut frankly, I can’t think of any -music- you could make with Nuendo that you couldn’t make as easy with Cubase. There are important differences from my POV, but I think they would -mainly- matter to people doing -very- complex audio mixes… as you’d have in a movie.ĭirect Routing comes to mind-which I would -love-, the automation write options are cooler and the connections to crazy expensive remote controllers are better I think. At the risk of appearing unhelpful… what is it you feel lacking in your Cubase life that prompts you to consider Nuendo? Or is this mainly wondering about the grass being greener.

Cubase nuendo